← all parity reports
Mechanical
Kerf vs Cimatron
Integrated mold CAD/CAM from quote to shop floor — versus an open-core alternative that adds Moldflow fill simulation and multi-domain engineering.
11/11in Kerf today
10/11in Cimatron (included)
0behind a paid tier
2026-05-24last reviewed
Grouped by discipline (D1–D14), same as Kerf's own capability list. Click a section to expand it.
D1 Geometry & core CAD
D7 Manufacturing / CAM
| Capability | Kerf | Cimatron |
|---|---|---|
| Moldflow / fill sim |
yes
packages/kerf-manufacturing/src/kerf_manufacturing/moldflow/flow_front.py
|
yes source ↗ |
| Parting line / cavity-core split |
yes
packages/kerf-mold/src/kerf_mold/mold.py
|
yes source ↗ |
| Mold base library | yes | yes source ↗ |
| Cooling channel design |
yes
packages/kerf-mold/src/kerf_mold/cooling.py
|
yes source ↗ |
| Electrode design (EDM) | yes | yes source ↗ |
| 5-axis CNC machining |
yes
packages/kerf-cam/src/
|
yes source ↗ |
| Wire EDM | yes | yes source ↗ |
D14 Cost / materials / LCA
| Capability | Kerf | Cimatron |
|---|---|---|
| Quote-to-delivery workflow |
yes
packages/kerf-costing/src/
|
yes source ↗ |
- yes shipped
- partial works with limits
- paid tier present, but behind an add-on or meter
- no not available
Corrections welcome. These rows are read off published documentation on the date shown and go stale as products ship. If a row is wrong, open an issue — the source file is public/compare/cimatron.md and every claim in it carries a link.